Analyzing Misunderstanding in Communication Essay

I. Introduction1.1 BackgroundThere be many things to do when students be having time together with their friends. They arse role thoughts and feelings with each other or discuss homework, lessons and so forth. Topics will commingle naturally when comfortable z maven in the communication dupe been reached. Those argon some of evidences which show that people submit with others.Communication is an exchange of ideas, knowledge, and so forth between individuals by using verbiage in which all parties run across the language they use. Communication for certain involves more than one person, which averages that there are more than one thought involved in the communication be wee everyone has different backgrounds, experiences, etc. There are two positions in communication, they are as a vector and as pass receiver and they will obligate turn to these positions. All communication has two parts a sender and a receiver. The sender has a message he or she intends to transmit, a nd s/he puts it in words, which, to her/him, best reflect what s/he is thinking. moreover many things corporation intervene to prevent the intended message from creation received accurately. (Burgess, 2013).Read more Different reasons why people herald essayMisunderstandings sometimes occur in this exchange of ideas in communication. The receiver hears solely he does non listen. He does not absorb the points creation made. It may because the receiver does not counsel on what the sender or speaker has said. a few sees are language-related, the source of many of the sees bum be traced to ambiguity in the speakers utterances. Other reasons for misunderstanding include mishearing and lack of world knowledge, namely, factors that also contribute to misunderstanding in intracultural communication., (Kaur 2011). There are some other factors which we will watch over that rear end cause misunderstanding in communication if we analyze our experiences in having communicati on with others.1.2 Purpose of writingThe purposes of this writing area) To find out the factors cause misunderstanding in communication, especially in the conversation which will be shown by the writer in the retrospective data section.b) To show what students usually chatter just about when they are gathering with their friends.II. Retrospective DataEveryone certainly has experienced misunderstanding when have communication with others friends, relatives, teachers, etc. Misunderstanding not only occurs in communication involving different languages, cultures, etc. People communicate with other who has the same language can also experience misunderstanding in which. It authoriseed to me, I communicated with my friends by using same language but I still have misunderstanding in the communication. Thus, in this paper, I try to analyze misunderstanding in communication that I have experienced with my friends.At that time, we were going to get together card (bridge) while talking a bout the latest Korean movie. Everyone already had their cards that had been dealt. There collar maneuverers in this game, namely, I, Ima and Anthi. Ima Apa film korea terbaru sekarang teman-teman? (what is the latest Korean movie, guys?) I and Anthi Emergency orthodontic bracesIma Iiih mau (Can I have the copy?)Anthi Bagus tau Maa (It is really amazing, Maa)I Iya bener dah Maa (Shes true, Maa)Ima Siapa main? (Who is the cast?)I Yang punya angka 3 keriting sih (Who has the 3-kinky card of course play first) They both looked at me and laughed. I thought for a moment about why they laughed at me and I just need a few minutes to understand why they did it. I Oooh.. (I see)I and Anthi Ji Hyo yang maiiin ( Ji Hyo is main character/ one of the casts)III. Analysis/DiscussionCommunication is a complex human activity that is successful most of the time. This, however, does not mean that understanding is granted or that it is always the case. Misunderstanding is a rhythmic non-extraord inary feature of human interaction, whether communicative interaction is cross-cultural or not (Dascal 1985 Brown 1995 in BOU-FRANCH, Patricia (2002)).The data is one of examples which shows that the misunderstanding could still experience even all the parties in the communication have the same culture, language and age. The misunderstanding is happened when I said Yang punya angka 3 keriting sih (Who has the 3-kinky card of course play first). I said that because I thought my friend, Ima, asked who played first or who had turn to set down the game. I thought in that way because at that time I had just set my card and had ready to start playacting the game and because I had the 3-kinky card. What is the importance of having the 3-kinky card? The rule of playing Jenderal using bridge card in Indonesia, particularly in Lombok, is the one who plays first is the person who has the 3-kinky card.If we analyze the data more deeply, we will find that misunderstanding in the communication happened because I did not focus on the conversation when Ima asked, Siapa main? (Who is the cast?. I still focus on what we were talking about at the first talk but for the beside I did not. It was not caused by lack of world knowledge because we can see from the conversation that at the end I understood or recognized that I had misunderstanding then I fixed it.IV. outcomeIn conclusion, misunderstanding is a common thing that can happen in whether communicative interaction is cross-cultural or not. Misunderstanding caused by many factors such as ambiguity in the speakers utterances, lack of world knowledge, mishearing, etc. The data shows that the other factor that can cause misunderstanding in communication is being not focus on the conversation. Besides that, the data also shows one of what students usually talk about when they are gathering with their friends is the latest movie.V. ReferencesBOU-FRANCH, Patricia (2002) Misunderstandings and Unofficial Knowledge in Institution al Discourse, in David Walton & Dagmar Scheu (eds) Culture and Power Ac(unofficially)knowledging pagan Studies in Spain, Bern Peter Lang. (pp. 323-341)Burgess, Heidi. Misunderstandings. Beyond Intractability. Eds. Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess. troth Information Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. Posted September 2003 . sKaur, Jagdish. Intercultural Pragmatics. Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 93116, ISSN (Online) 1613-365X, ISSN (Print) 1612-295X, DOI 10.1515/IPRG.2011.004, February 2011