Third World Countries Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Third World Countries - Essay ExampleAccordingly, underdevelopment emerges as a consequences of culture, politics, dependency and colonialisation, although not necessarily in that order.Dependency theorists look towards history for the clarification of the reasons why some countries have successfully attained economic development while others have displayed a inflexible failure to do the same and, are immediately influenced by Wallersteins world systems theory. The aforementioned may be defined in the following terms (DuPlessis, 1988 222)Wallersteins method, is premised on two linked propositions low that social channelise occurs only in social systems and second, that the social system appropriate as an object of analysis is a world system Hence, his concern is with the evolution of structures of the whole system, understood as entirely distinct from its atom parts, rather than with the histories - even if treated comparatively - of the various regions, nations or people that it includes. A world system, is a real, identifiable, analyzable thing bounded and substantially self-contained, it consists of a unified economy founded on a well-developed air division of labor yet incorporating a multiplicity of cultures.As may be deduced from the above quote, the World Systems possible action (WST) defines the global political economy as a single whole, but comprised of numerous distinct categories. The first category is the core, who benefited the most from the capitalist world economy, because they were the colonial powers and motivated colonialism in order to expand both(prenominal) their economic and political influence over the globe, using their strong military forces to do so ( new-made History Sourcebook, n.d. n.p.). The second category, the Periphery, can be defined as the exploited and the oppressed compared to the exploiter and oppressor situation of the core. As Lachman (1988) argues, the periphery countries did not have the strong and stable polit ical systems which the core did, also absentminded the military force which the core had. Consequently, this left them vulnerable to forced political and economic exploitation.Even with the end of colonialism, the systems theory remains very active for two reasons. The first is that the economic effects of imperialism are long-term. This historical era gave the North or the core, a tremendous head start over the South in terms of development, even culminating in the regression of the economies of the South and limiting their potential for development. As stated in the Modern History Sourcebook, according to Wallersteins systems theory, an analysis of the history of the capitalist world system shows that it has brought about a skewed development in which the economic and social disparities between sections of the world economy have increase rather than provided prosperity for all. The second is that colonialism was ultimately followed by neo-colonialism, whereby the multinational corporate representatives of the core continued the drain of the souths resources and its transference to the North (Li, 2000). As per the presented argument, representing the stand of the dependency theorists on the question of the Souths continued underdevelopment, underdevelopment is rooted in historical circumstances which effectively ensured the impoverishment of the South and its