Scholarly vs Popular Writing

intellectual versus favorite writing among accounting cla white plagues through various different resources. Researching the popular Wikipedia. com, an internet website and the Walden library to do a comparison of articles for credibility. Wikipedia. com is not a scholarly resource, on the basis that Scholarly writing is usually moderate to journals or textbooks, which are more difficult to find in the grocery place and are usually read by academics. In an article by ProQuest (2001) a publication is considered scholarly if it is authored by academics for a orchestrate audience that is mainly academic, which would then seem to exclude Wikipedia.com from being a scholarly resource. In conclusion, I think it is safe to cease that with the above mentioned points Wikipedia. com is not a scholarly resource. Wikipedis. com is also not a credible resource for the sideline reasons. One being that the site displace be changed by anyone and that persons credentials can be unknown, irr elevant or nonexistent. The sources or references listed for which the information is based on can be invalid, need relevance or reliability. A second reason would be what was create verbally may not necessarily had been for academic or professional audiences.Because it is indecipherable how many other theories were exhausted from consideration, and ideas expressed could be based solely on unilateral or opinion. Lastly I would say doubt of the accuracy of information provided. In example, dates can be out dated, erroneous, or not based on the facts. All the before mentioned are bring factors to why I believe Wikipedia. com is not a credible resource. It is permissible to use a non-scholarly resources depending on the timbre of the resource used and stem youre researching.Should I ever be presented with the inability to find a peer reviewed article, I would retreat to the next best thing a highly respected trade publication. Like if I was writing nigh insurance I would use and accepted trade publication in the insurance industry. Although it might not be scholarly, or as quality as a scholarly article may be, they can sometimes be credible. A credible resource through the internet for the use in the field of management http//mdpi. com/journal/jrfm. On this site you entrust find this journal on risk and financial management, which are two under the general umbrella of management.The site not only includes change topics in management with peer reviewed articles based on in shrewdness research but it also is based on theoretical concepts for academics with pragmatical applications in mind. When determining if the resource I am using biased in its information or viewpoints I would have to ask the following questions. rear the writer benefit from expressing a particular viewpoint? Can the writer benefit by suppressing specific information? Is the information back up by other credible resources? Does the resource support a disfavor or a particular stereo type? Any of these could evoke a resource is biased.